Nobody ever said that vitamins are an easy subject to understand – and although they are essential for life, too much or too little of a vitamin can make a huge difference to an animal’s health. Valerie Parker makes it all clear in her excellent review of Vitamin D.
Share on social media
There are no universally accepted “normal” reference ranges for vitamin D metabolites. Part of the difficulty in interpreting laboratory results relates to the fact that multiple techniques are employed to measure the metabolites; these include liquid chromatographic methods, immunoassay techniques, chemiluminescence immunoassays, and radioimmunoassays. There can be significant inter-assay, intra-assay, and interlaboratory variance. In an effort to assist in the development of standard reference materials and to examine differences among assay performance the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS) established a Vitamin D Metabolites Quality Assurance Program (VitDQAP). Comparability of vitamin D metabolite measurements has improved greatly over time via development of these quality control efforts; however, the studies were performed with human samples, and the effect of a canine or feline matrix on these variables and comparability of results is unknown.
Liquid chromatography assays are currently the most commonly used methods and remain the criterion-referenced standard (liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection) for measurement. Wherever possible, it is recommended to use a laboratory that has received certification either from The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Vitamin D Standardization-Certification Program (VDSCP) and/ or the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) to increase the likelihood of accurate results.
Vitamin D metabolites have been measured in dogs with several forms of kidney disease, including acute renal failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and proteinuric kidney disease.Dogs with CKD have lower 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2 D concentrations compared with concentrations in control dogs [3] [4] [5]. Vitamin D metabolites are correlated with the stage of kidney disease (determined via International Renal Interest Society criteria), as indicated by the fact that concentrations of 25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)2 D and 24,25(OH)2 D are significantly decreased in dogs with stage 3 kidney disease, compared with control dogs [3] [4]. However, in other studies, many dogs had 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2 D concentrations within reference limits [6] [7]. One possible explanation for this lack of difference could be the inclusion of dogs with earlier stages of CKD. Alternatively, significant differences in concentrations of vitamin D metabolites may not have been detected because of relatively large reference ranges or the method used to calculate reference ranges.
One of the consequences of CKD is the development of secondary hyperparathyroidism and CKD-induced mineral and bone disorders ( Figure 2 ). Plasma FGF23 concentrations are increased in dogs with CKD, and the concentration of FGF-23 has been found to be negatively correlated with 25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)2 D, and 24,25(OH)2 D concentrations and survival in dogs with CKD [4] [8].Calcitriol treatment has been recommended for several decades for dogs with CKD to reduce PTH concentrations and improve quality of life. However, prospective, controlled clinical studies are needed to determine the manner in which supplementation with various forms of vitamin D influences FGF-23 concentrations, Klotho expression, vitamin D repletion, quality of life, preservation of renal function, and survival.
Finally, dogs with acute renal failure have been reported to have significantly lower 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2 D concentrations, compared with control dogs, but most (7/10) of the dogs with acute renal failure had concentrations within reference limits [6]. These findings possibly could have been attributable to acute inflammation or critical illness, or could have been spurious results. Proteinuric dogs have significantly lower 25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)2 D, and 24,25(OH)2 D concentrations than control dogs. This relationship has been definitively established in people with proteinuria, and VDR activators are frequently prescribed to reduce proteinuria in such cases.
There are several mechanisms by which vitamin D metabolism can be disrupted with kidney disease, including decreased dietary intake of vitamin D, decreased enzymatic conversion from cholecalciferol to 25(OH)D in the liver, decreased activation via 1α-hydroxylase from 25(OH)D to 1,25(OH)2 D, and increased inactivation of 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2 D. With proteinuria, there are additional potential mechanisms to consider, including urinary loss of VDBP (with 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2 D bound to VDBP) and decreased endocytosis of 25(OH)D into renal cells because of decreased megalin expression in the proximal renal tubules. Furthermore, inflammation may act to reduce 25(OH)D concentrations.
Valerie J. Parker
Serum 1,25(OH)2 D concentrations have been measured in populations of dogs with lymphoma, both with and without hypercalcemia, with wide differences in findings. From an antineoplastic standpoint, calcitriol can have in vitro activity against osteosarcoma, squamous cell carcinoma, neoplastic prostatic epithelial cells, transitional cell carcinoma, mammary gland cancer, and mast cell tumor canine cell lines. One study revealed a synergistic effect of administering calcitriol with cisplatin against various tumors (e.g., osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma) in dogs [10]. Investigators of another study found that calcitriol treatment could induce remission of mast cell tumors, but the trial was discontinued because of the high rate of toxicity (i.e., hypercalcemia and azotemia) observed [11].
Although primary hyperparathyroidism is technically a neoplastic condition, it is separated here to avoid confusion with malignant conditions, because most dogs with primary hyperthyroidism have benign parathyroid gland adenomas. Compared with control dogs, five dogs with primary hyperparathyroidism had significantly lower serum 25(OH)D concentrations [7] although all values for the affected dogs were within reference limits. Serum 1,25(OH)2 D concentrations were significantly higher in dogs with primary hyperparathyroidism than in control dogs, and 1,25(OH)2 D concentrations in 4 of 5 dogs with primary hyperparathyroidism were above reference limits [7]. Both findings could possibly be attributed to an upregulating effect of PTH on renal 1α-hydroxylase activity, which would increase 1,25(OH)2 D synthesis.
In a study of 10 dogs with primary hyperparathyroidism treated by surgical excision of parathyroid gland adenomas, all had low 25(OH)D concentrations at the time of diagnosis, compared with control dogs, whereas 1,25(OH)2 D concentrations were within reference limits. At the time of the post-parathyroidectomy nadir in ionized calcium concentration, 25(OH)D concentrations did not differ from results at the time of initial diagnosis, but mean 1,25(OH)2 D concentrations were lower [12].
A diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism has traditionally been made on the basis of an increased ionized calcium concentration at the time of an inappropriately high concentration of PTH. The concentration of circulating 25(OH)D is an important regulatory factor for the suppression of PTH synthesis in humans (likely following its conversion to 1,25(OH)2 D within the parathyroid gland). Concentrations of PTH are higher in humans with concomitant lower circulating 25(OH) D concentrations. It is currently recommended that a diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism in humans is made only when 25(OH)D concentrations are sufficient or after 25(OH)D has been normalized following supplementation with vitamin D. The importance of concurrent evaluation of ionized calcium, PTH, and 25(OH)D concentrations to make an accurate diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism has not yet been investigated in veterinary medicine.
Absorption of fat-soluble vitamins depends on adequate absorption of dietary fat; malabsorptive intestinal diseases can therefore adversely affect vitamin D absorption and ultimately contribute to hypovitaminosis D. Serum 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2 D concentrations have been evaluated in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and proteinlosing enteropathy (PLE), and both metabolites were significantly lower in the PLE group than in dogs with IBD or healthy dogs [13] [14]. Additionally, lower 25(OH)D concentrations were significantly correlated with duodenal inflammation and death [14] [15] [16].
It is possible that hypoalbuminemia contributes to hypovitaminosis D through loss of VDBP via diseased intestines. Alternatively, hypovitaminosis D may contribute to intestinal protein loss through the effect of vitamin D on the immune response. It is known that vitamin D receptor–knockout mice are more likely to develop induced IBD, and vitamin D-deficient diets predispose mice to colitis via dysregulated colonic antimicrobial activity and impaired homeostasis of enteric bacteria [17].
Osteoblasts and chondrocytes express 1α-hydroxylase and VDR but it is unknown whether vitamin D plays a direct or indirect role in bone growth and mineralization. Rickets is a metabolic bone disease typically caused by dietary deficiency of vitamin D, calcium or phosphorus, or by genetic defects affecting vitamin D or phosphorus metabolism ( Figure 3 ). The most common clinical abnormality is widening of the physeal growth plates of fast-growing bones such as the radius and ulna. Histologically, hypertrophic chondrocytes accumulate, which leads to thickened, irregular growth plates. Animals fed unbalanced meat-based diets without vitamin D supplementation are more likely to develop fibrous osteodystrophy, rather than rickets, because of the development of nutritional hyperparathyroidism. For an animal with dietaryinduced rickets, treatment entails transitioning the animal to a complete and balanced diet.
Two autosomal recessive disorders that cause vitamin D-dependent rickets (VDDR) in humans are recognized. Type I VDDR is caused by a defect in the gene encoding 1α-hydroxylase, which subsequently leads to inadequate activation of 25(OH)D to form 1,25(OH)2 D. This leads to 25(OH)D concentrations within the reference range but low 1,25(OH)2 D concentrations. Type II VDDR is caused by a defect in the VDR gene, which leads to hypocalcemia, secondary hyperparathyroidism, and high 1,25(OH)2 D concentrations. A few cases of both types of VDDR have been reported in dogs [18] [19]. Treatment of type I VDDR entails providing supplemental 1,25(OH)2 D and typically has a better prognosis than type II VDDR, which requires high doses of both 1,25(OH)2 D and calcium. Most mutations in people result in a defective VDR that can no longer respond to even high doses of 1,25(OH)2 D. Some children can be treated by high doses of 1,25(OH)2 D that overcome the defect in binding affinity for 1,25(OH)2 D.
Numerous studies have identified decreased concentrations of vitamin D metabolites in dogs with various diseases; however, it has not yet been determined whether such animals should receive supplemental vitamin D or vitamin D metabolites, and if so, the manner for providing them. Potential options include vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol), vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), calcidiol, calcitriol, or other VDR activators (e.g., paricalcitol).
In a prospective study of canine atopic dermatitis, pruritus and lesion scores improved with cholecalciferol intake [1]. There was minimal toxicity observed but extremely high doses (up to 1400 IU/kg, higher than recommended by either AAFCO or NRC) were required to affect serum 25(OH)D concentrations and clinical signs. Recently, a modified-release formulation of 25(OH)D has been approved for the treatment of humans with advanced CKD4 . Providing supplemental 25(OH)D to dogs more rapidly and efficiently increases serum 25(OH)D concentrations than does cholecalciferol, but additional studies are necessary to elucidate appropriate dosing recommendations.
4 Rayaldee, OPKO Healthy Inc, Miami, Fla
The goal of supplementation with vitamin D or 25(OH)D should be to increase serum 25(OH)D concentrations and improve outcomes specific to the disease being managed (e.g., reducing pruritus or improving the survival rate or duration). The form of supplemental vitamin D administered, half-life of the product, and potential for toxic effects may differ, so caution must be exercised, and treated animals must be monitored closely.
Vitamin D toxicosis is most commonly diagnosed after the development of hypercalcemia and a subsequent risk for acute kidney injury and soft tissue mineralization. Development of hypercalcemia as a result of vitamin D toxicosis is a relatively late finding. Several factors influence the potential for vitamin D toxicosis, including lipophilicity, affinity of vitamin D metabolites for VDBP, and rates of metabolite synthesis and degradation. Vitamin D is fat soluble, a major reason why it has a long whole-body half-life of approximately 2 months. Half-lives for 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2 D are approximately 2-3 weeks and 4-6 hours, respectively.
Vitamin D toxicosis in humans that results in hypercalcemia is thought to occur when serum 25(OH)D concentrations exceed 100-150 ng/mL. In studies of various animal species (rats, cows, pigs, rabbits, dogs, and horses), plasma 25(OH)D concentrations associated with hypercalcemia exceed 150 ng/mL. The most commonly encountered forms of vitamin D toxicosis in dogs include ingestion of cholecalciferol rodenticides ( Figure 4 ) and skin creams that contain calcitriol or an analogue (calcipotriol/calcipotriene). Occasionally, misformulation of commercial pet foods may contribute to vitamin D toxicosis. Iatrogenic toxicosis, typically determined by measurement of 1,25(OH)2 D concentrations, may occur secondary to provision of supplemental calcitriol for management of renal secondary hyperparathyroidism, primary hypoparathyroidism, PLE, or pre- or postsurgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism.
Note that hypercalciuria develops during the early phases of vitamin D toxicosis, before hypercalcemia develops, and can have a negative impact by increasing the risk of developing calciumcontaining uroliths and renal injury. The urinary calcium-to-creatinine ratio is used to detect hypercalciuria in humans, and this concept has received attention in the investigation of dogs that form calcium-containing uroliths.
Vitamin D homeostasis is characterized by complex interactions between vitamin D metabolites, ionized calcium, phosphorus, FGF-23, and Klotho, and regulatory pathways can be disrupted in a variety of ways. Although reference limits for serum vitamin D metabolites in healthy dogs remain to be determined, many diseases have been associated with lower concentrations of vitamin D metabolites, whereas some have been associated with increased concentrations. The chicken-and-egg conundrum often applies to these diseases, and it is not definitively clear whether vitamin D deficiency is the cause or the result of these diseases. Additional studies are needed to determine whether vitamin D supplementation for dogs with certain diseases would improve patient outcomes, and the form and dosing regimen that would best provide this supplemental vitamin D.
Dr. Parker received her DVM from Tufts University and went on to complete a smallanimal internship at the Animal Medical Center in New York City. She then undertook asmall animal internal medicine residency at Iowa State University and a clinical nutritionresidency at Tufts University. She is currently associate professor at OSU, with researchinterests that include vitamin D status in chronic kidney disease and its relationship tonutrition management.
Various forms of vitamin D supplementation exist, but it is not clear what the best form of supplementation is for most diseases.
Vitamin D metabolism is complex and is affected by numerous dietary and hormonal factors.
Dietary vitamin D intake cannot predict a dog’s 25(OH)D status.
Depending on the methodology used, vitamin D metabolite concentrations can vary dramatically, and interlaboratory results may not be comparable.